All Posts

Canada’s last fatal duel took place near Perth, Ontario, in 1833. This article explains the old duelling offence, the case behind it, and why the law remained until 2018.

For more than a century, Canada's Criminal Code made it a serious offence to intentionally alarm the Sovereign, carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years' imprisonment. Discover why this unusual law was created, why no reported prosecutions have ever been found, and why Parliament ultimately repealed it in 2019.

An examination of how time allocation, closure, floor-crossing, and in-camera committees have limited parliamentary debate under the Carney government.

Canada has had its share of unusual laws. Explore the fascinating history behind outdated Canadian laws, discover which ones have been repealed, which surprising laws still exist, and separate legal fact from fiction.

Do squatters really have rights in Canada? Learn the truth behind one of Canada's most misunderstood legal topics, including how adverse possession works, common myths, and why the rules vary by province.

Dying without a Will in Ontario can significantly affect who inherits an estate and who is responsible for administering it. Learn how Ontario's intestacy laws work, who qualifies as a beneficiary, and what happens when no valid Will exists.

The first personal injury laws appeared more than 4,000 years ago in the Code of Ur-Nammu, the oldest surviving legal code known to history. Long before modern courts and lawsuits, ancient Sumerian law required compensation for injuries such as broken bones, lost teeth, and severed limbs. This article explores how these early laws worked, what the compensation awards may have been worth, and how they helped shape the foundations of modern personal injury law.

Croke v. VuPoint System Ltd. is a significant Ontario employment law decision examining frustration of contract, workplace vaccination requirements, and the circumstances under which an employment relationship may legally come to an end without constituting wrongful dismissal. The case continues to influence discussions surrounding third-party workplace requirements and employment rights in Canada.

Recent federal legislation, including Bill C-5, Bill C-9, Bill C-12, and Bill C-2, has sparked debate among lawyers, civil liberties organizations, Indigenous leaders, and constitutional scholars. This article examines the concerns being raised about Charter rights, Indigenous consultation, privacy protections, procedural fairness, and the growing use of fast-tracked legislation in Canada.

A single word in Canada's Constitution sparked one of the most important legal battles in Canadian history. The Persons Case challenged whether women were considered "persons" for Senate appointments, ultimately leading to a landmark 1929 decision that reshaped constitutional law and established the enduring "living tree" doctrine. This article explores the case, the Famous Five, and the lasting impact of a decision that continues to influence Canadian courts today.

Recent decisions in Cowichan Tribes v. Canada (Attorney General), 2025 BCSC 1490 and Wolastoqey Nations v. New Brunswick, 2025 NBCA 129 have renewed debate about Aboriginal title and private property rights in Canada. This article examines the legal principles behind Aboriginal title, the significance of these landmark cases, and the unresolved questions that continue to shape this evolving area of Canadian law.

The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia, released on May 15, 2026, recognized a new tort of intimate partner violence. The ruling reflects a growing understanding that abuse may involve more than physical acts and can include coercive control, financial restriction, isolation, intimidation, and ongoing patterns affecting dignity, autonomy, and independence.

Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act, 2026, has reopened Canada’s long standing debate over privacy, encryption, and investigative access. The bill has drawn support from government officials who describe it as modernization legislation, while technology companies, privacy advocates, and critics question its impact on encryption, digital rights, investment, and Canada’s technology sector.

Parental leave Canada is governed by provincial employment laws and federal Employment Insurance benefits, which together set out leave duration, job protection, and income support for eligible individuals.

Court filings in Ontario do not always reflect real-time developments. Documents may be submitted, matters resolved, and confirmations received, yet the court record can lag behind. This article examines how filing systems, procedural rules, and administrative delays can create gaps between what has occurred and what appears in the official record.

Backyard chickens and local bylaws in Ontario

Major infrastructure projects in Canada often take years to complete due to overlapping legal requirements, regulatory reviews, and constitutional obligations. This article examines how these processes operate in practice, why timelines extend, and how outcomes can range from approval to delay or cancellation, with broader economic implications.

Failure to comply with court-ordered conditions in Canada may result in separate criminal charges. Section 145 of the Criminal Code governs breaches of release orders, undertakings, and court attendance obligations.

Members of Parliament in Canada can change political parties after election and retain their seats, a lawful practice that continues to raise questions about voter expectations and democratic accountability.

In October 1970, the Canadian government invoked the War Measures Act during the October Crisis following kidnappings carried out by the Front de libération du Québec (FLQ). The decision granted the federal government extraordinary emergency powers and led to widespread arrests, military deployment in Quebec, and a national debate about civil liberties and government authority.